It has been a busy few weeks for Electronic Frontiers Australia as public outrage against the Government’s Internet censorship plan ignited around the country. EFA has served as a gateway for information on the scheme and a rallying point for opposition. Our revamped campaign website at http://nocleanfeed.com has seen an explosion in traffic, [...]]]>

Dear EFA Supporter,

It has been a busy few weeks for Electronic Frontiers Australia as public outrage against the Government’s Internet censorship plan ignited around the country. EFA has served as a gateway for information on the scheme and a rallying point for opposition. Our revamped campaign website at http://nocleanfeed.com has seen an explosion in traffic, and the EFA board has done dozens of interviews in print, on radio and television getting the word out to the Australian public. See below for just a sample.

The campaign is working. On the internet, letters to the editor pages and talk-back stations around the country, the Australian public are up in arms. MPs around the country are being flooded with calls, letters and emails demanding an end to the censorship plans. If we keep it up, sufficient pressure can be summoned to bring about a full-scale retreat from this ludicrous and undemocratic position.

EFA will not be easing up the pressure. We will be increasing our online presence, working with other community groups to organise activism, preparing policy analysis material for politicians and journalists, and spreading the bad news with targeted advertising. We will be lobbying selected politicians, so with your continued support we expect to be banging on the doors of power in Canberra regularly over the coming months.

There are a few things you can do to help keep momentum building.

- If you haven’t already, visit the campaign website, and write to your local MP telling them how upset you are.
- Join our Action Alert mailing list here: http://lists.efa.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/alert and be ready to respond when a call for targeted action is made.
- Follow us on Twitter for frequent campaign updates.
- Volunteer. Got special skills in web or graphic design, online advertising, video production, community building or copy writing?
- Got expertise in the subject you’d like to share? Willing to hit the phones? Let us know.
- Send us feedback on the campaign (feedback@efa.org.au), and where you’d like to see EFA target its resources.
- Make a donation (http://www.efa.org.au/support/donations/) so that we can continue to fund our ongoing activities.

We haven’t forgotten about our other campaigns, either. Our campaign site pushing for an R18+ category for computer games went live last week at http://www.r18games.com. As always, check EFA’s home page for latest news.

-The EFA Board

EFA in the news

Filtering out the fury: how government tried to gag web censor critics
http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/biztech/labors-net-gag-worse-than-iran/2008/10/23/1224351430987.html

Filter to cause World Wide Wait
http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,24575125-15306,00.html

Net filters may block porn and gambling sites
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/10/27/1224955916155.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1

Stranglehold on the Internet
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,24561421-5006364,00.html

Channel 7’s Morning program
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=xThNk0Vd4ws

Electronic Frontiers Australia Inc. (EFA) www.efa.org.au

Media Release: 2 Jan 2008

Title: EFA Attacks Clean-Feed Proposal

Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA) today attacked a government plan, championed by Communications Minister Stephen Conroy, that would mandate “clean feed” filtered Internet connections to all homes [...]]]> The new Australian government’s proposed Internet censorship regime has been widely and rightly condemned. Here’s EFA’s position:

Electronic Frontiers Australia Inc. (EFA)
www.efa.org.au

Media Release: 2 Jan 2008

Title: EFA Attacks Clean-Feed Proposal

Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA) today attacked a government plan, championed by Communications Minister Stephen Conroy, that would mandate “clean feed” filtered Internet connections to all homes and schools. This scheme, which will supposedly censor the Internet of pornography and other “inappropriate material”, goes further than the Coalition’s previous policies, by requiring individuals to opt-out of the scheme rather than request filtering from their service provider.

“Waving the ’save the children’ flag may be good politics, but it ignores serious technological problems which will likely cause the proposed scheme to fail,” said EFA Chair Dale Clapperton. “Furthermore, Australia is supposed to be a liberal democracy where adults have the freedom to say and read what they want, not just what the Government decides is ‘appropriate’ for them.”

“These announcements smack of the condescending paternalism which contributed to the downfall of the Howard government,” Clapperton continued. “The proposals threaten the free speech rights of every Australian, and our concerns will not be silenced by Government sound bites equating free speech with access to child pornography.”

EFA has previously raised concerns about Australia joining North Korea, China and Burma in the club of nations who censor their citizens’ access to the internet. While the Minister makes no apologies for this alarming development, he has given us little reason to put our faith in his bureaucrats to administer such a system competently, transparently and fairly.

“Who decides what is ‘appropriate’ for adult Australians to read on the Internet, and according to what standards?”, asked Clapperton. “What will happen if the Government decides that information about abortion or gay marriage is ‘inappropriate’ at the behest of Family First Senator Steve Fielding?”

In an attempt to dismiss the policy’s critics, Senator Conroy said “If people equate freedom of speech with watching child pornography, then the Rudd-Labor Government is going to disagree.” EFA notes, however, that child pornography is already illegal, and very unlikely to come to the attention of either the casual web user or the censors themselves. “senator Conroy’s attempt to equate freedom of speech with access to child pornography is a transparent attempt to deter criticism of this fundamentally flawed proposal,” said Mr Clapperton.

Implementation of the proposal, insofar as it is technically possible, would cause significant technical and administrative headaches for Australia’s Internet Service Providers. “This can only have the effect of making Australians’ access to the internet slower and more expensive,” said Clapperton. “Given the Prime Minister’s election promise to focus on improving the nation’s access to broadband, the fact that the first measures put in place should do the exact opposite is as disappointing as it is bewildering.”

With billions of web pages available on the internet and changing every day, the crucial technical and administrative details of how the clean feed will be created have not yet been made available. Although the Minister has asserted that the Internet will not “grind to a halt”, he has yet to explain to Internet engineers how he plans to accomplish a feat that experts acknowledge would be very difficult. “Anyone with a better understanding of the Internet than the Minister will tell you this system simply will not work,” said Clapperton. “But a lot of taxpayers’ money will be wasted if we try.”

EFA supports measures to provide filtering software to homes where it is requested, and to educate parents on monitoring their children’s online activities. “Unfortunately, ISP based filtering will not make the Internet safe for children, and may even cause harm in and of itself. If parents are deceived into believing that a ‘filtered’ Internet service is safe for children, they will be less likely to take sensible precautions such as supervising their children while they use the Internet.”

At a time when all sides of politics acknowledge the importance of developing our information economy, EFA feels that this announcement sends the wrong message to the rest of the world. “The Coalition was rightly ridiculed by the rest of the world when they announced in the late 1990’s that they would censor Australian’s Internet access. The Coalition, at least, sensibly realised that their proposals were technologically infeasible. It seems that the current Minister with responsibility for the Internet has yet to learn that lesson.”

– Ends –

Below is:
- Background information
- Contact details for media

Background:
ABC News article on the announcement:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/12/31/2129471.htm

Past media releases by Senator Conroy about internet filtering:

http://www.senatorconroy.com/media95.html

http://www.senatorconroy.com/media70.html

About EFA:
Electronic Frontiers Australia Inc. (“EFA”) is a non-profit national organisation representing Internet users concerned with on-line rights and freedoms. EFA was established in 1994, is independent of government and commerce, and is funded by membership subscriptions and donations from individuals and organisations with an altruistic interest in promoting online civil liberties.

Marcus Westbury October 18, 2007

In the music scene there has always been a pretty strong division between those who play original music and those who are derisively, and sometimes unfairly, dismissed as covers bands. What’s the point of being in a band if you’re not playing your own songs? When was the last time that duo [...]]]> http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/10/17/1192300857463.html

Marcus Westbury
October 18, 2007

In the music scene there has always been a pretty strong division between those who play original music and those who are derisively, and sometimes unfairly, dismissed as covers bands. What’s the point of being in a band if you’re not playing your own songs? When was the last time that duo with a keyboard and a drum machine from your local RSL club had a breakthrough hit?

It’s not that covers bands aren’t talented, don’t make good music, don’t entertain or even have a good time. Hell, put enough drinks in me and I’ll hit the dance floor to an ’80s pop classic or wave a lighter with half a tear in my eye to, say, Flame Trees.

But no one seriously goes out of their way to suggest that covers bands are the most vital or important part of the music scene. Why then are covers bands – of the high-culture variety – receiving the bulk of arts funding?

An overwhelming amount of arts funding in Australia goes to organisations that either exclusively or primarily play covers. Think symphony orchestras, opera companies and state theatre companies that produce comparatively little in the way of original, innovative or even Australian work. Like classic hits radio, they are busting out the chart-toppers of the 17th, 18th, 19th and 20th centuries.

Confused? If you’re not sure what I’m talking about, grab yourself a copy of the Australia Council’s annual report. The nation’s cover bands, mostly the state-based symphony orchestras, collectively receive just under $50 million each year from the council.

Whether that figure seems average or outrageous would depend on the context that you choose to put it in. The context that I put it in is the $4.8 million pool that every single musician in Australia who isn’t in a symphony orchestra competes for every year. That’s more than a 10-fold disparity between the orchestras and everyone else combined.

The Sydney Symphony receives nearly $9 million each year. That is more funding than goes to all of Australia’s visual artists, or all of the nation’s writers and publishers, or all the dancers, or all the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander artists, or all the community art practitioners.

Don’t get me wrong; I’m no heathen or unreconstructed postmodernist. Okay, I’m a bit of a heathen but I’ve never entirely got the postmodern thing. My problem is not that we still fund classical European culture, it’s just that we fund so bloody much of it and so very little of everything else.

My argument isn’t about form and it isn’t an extreme one. It’s about scale, equity and magnitude. I do think it would be a loss if Australians were to lose all connection with our vast and glorious European cultural heritage.

But Opera Australia receives more than $10 million a year from the Australia Council. Sure, opera is lavish, expensive and glorious but I simply cannot think of a single sensible, logical or sane reason why one opera company is valued roughly on par with more than 400 separate organisations supported by the music, dance, literature and inter-arts boards of the same organisation.

Great art to me creates a resonance and opens up possibilities; it isn’t the echoes of the past. It’s not something you reproduce proficiently. Art is made out of anger or curiosity or awe or beauty or because you’re in love or want someone to fall in love with you.

Artists don’t just preserve the past. They make new things from the sum total of human experience. They tell new stories and find new ways of telling stories from the tools and influences that they have around them.

Culture isn’t something that happened in Europe centuries ago that needs preservation. It’s actually all that messy, beautiful, inspiring and wonderful stuff that is happening around us right now. Arts funding should reward innovation not preservation and vibrancy over bureaucracy.

Most importantly, no one art form or institution – however regarded – should have its funding quarantined and its position privileged so that it is never tested against all the other possibilities to which its resources may better be put.

Marcus Westbury is the writer and presenter of Not Quite Art on Tuesday nights on ABC TV. marcus.westbury@gmail.com

An explanation.

SEMINAR

Digital Democracy Unpacked: A Critical Mapping of Five Ideal Typical Discourses

Dr Lincoln Dahlberg, School of Journalism and Communications The University of Queensland

When: 1 June, 5-6.30pm Where: UTS Broadway, Building 3, Level 2 (Room 210)

Digital democracy has become an increasingly popular topic among academics, political commentators, and policy makers: there is much talk about the [...]]]> Late notice, but this looks interesting:

SEMINAR

Digital Democracy Unpacked: A Critical Mapping of Five Ideal Typical Discourses

Dr Lincoln Dahlberg, School of Journalism and Communications
The University of Queensland

When: 1 June, 5-6.30pm
Where: UTS Broadway, Building 3, Level 2 (Room 210)

Digital democracy has become an increasingly popular topic among
academics, political commentators, and policy makers: there is much
talk about the potential of the Internet and other digital media
enhancing democracy. There has also been plenty of action, with
governments, civic organizations, universities and activists,
investigating this potential and supporting digital democracy
initiatives. All this commentary, research, policy making, and project
work draws on a diversity of understandings of digital democracy.
However, there is a lack of resources that clearly outline and examine
this diversity. This paper undertakes an ideal-typical reading and
critical evaluation of five digital democracy discourses and their
variations, with the aim of bringing attention to the range of
possibilities for democracy supported by digital media, and the
advantages and disadvantages of these different possibilities.

Lincoln is a post-doctoral research fellow in the School of Journalism
and Communication at The University of Queensland. He is co-editor of
the journal New Zealand Sociology and of the collection Radical
Democracy and the Internet (Palgrave, June 2007). Lincoln’s current
research involves a critical investigation of the practices and
meanings surrounding Internet use, with particular focus on the
extension of democratic cultures. He can be contacted at:
l.dahlberg@uq.edu.au

Hosted by: Research Initiative on International Activism:
www.international.activism.hss.uts.edu.au
James Goodman, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,
University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007.
Phone: (612) 9514 2714 Fax: (612) 9514 2332
Email: james.goodman@uts.edu.au
Web: www.international.activism.uts.edu.au

So TV weatherman Mike Bailey has decided to stand as a Labor candidate at the next federal election.

I always loved the dramatic way he’d say ‘the pressure is rising’ when giving the barometric report. The pressure always seemed to be rising. For a long time I’ve had the idea of taking a year of his [...]]]>

So TV weatherman Mike Bailey has decided to stand as a Labor candidate at the next federal election.

I always loved the dramatic way he’d say ‘the pressure is rising’ when giving the barometric report. The pressure always seemed to be rising. For a long time I’ve had the idea of taking a year of his barometric reports and turning them into a sound piece. But like most of my ideas for artworks (and blog posts) I couldn’t be bothered with the execution. Well, I have plenty of other things to be getting on with.

Here, have a song:

Luke Haines – Bailed Out (from Luke Haines is Dead)

Your star is descending
Round here blindly
Tell your dancing daughter
That there’s no room
on the wing
We can bitch
but it ain’t tinsel town
Hey! Starchild
Can’t dance
Left out on a useless limb

This party will start
To drag you down
Slap your face
and pull your hair

Bailed out, bailed out
Bailed out, this skin is shed
Bailed out, bailed out
Bailed out, this thing is dead

I was in traction
started off smiling
Couldn’t help laughing
I was astounded when
They caught you unaware
And some missionary said
That this week
we’ve got to shoot
All the dancing girls
And then replace them
With satellites instead.

This party will start
To drag you down
Slap your face
and pull your hair

Bailed out, bailed out
Bailed out, this skin is shed
Bailed out, bailed out
Bailed out, this thing is dead

Like to see something change
Around here, around there

Yep, that’ll fix it!

This Is Not Art is on in Newcastle this weekend. It’s my favourite Australian festival – if you’ve never been, you should check it out. I’ll be doing a couple of talks and a couple of performances.

I first heard her work a few months ago on FBi Radio’s Sunday Night at the Movies, and found out today that she’s also participating in ABC Radio’s Figure in a Soundscape project [...]]]> is a brilliant Australian sound collagist and radio producer, working in a similar style to Negativland, but with a more overtly political edge.

I first heard her work a few months ago on FBi Radio’s Sunday Night at the Movies, and found out today that she’s also participating in ABC Radio’s Figure in a Soundscape project that I’m involved in, so I finally got hold of her URLs.

Apart from her MySpace page, some of her work is available on CD and for download from the InterWebMegaLink. Highly recommended! Especially if you like the League of Infinite Justice.

This is your selected tribe: New Aquarians

Incidence in Population Proportion of Canadian population: 5 per cent Proportion of Gen Xers: 14 per cent

Other Demographics Mostly mirror the general [...]]]> It’s been a while since we’ve had a personality test here, but on Glen’s recommendation, I just did this one. And I got pretty much the same result as Glen too!

This is your selected tribe:
New Aquarians

Incidence in Population
Proportion of Canadian population: 5 per cent
Proportion of Gen Xers: 14 per cent

Other Demographics
Mostly mirror the general population

Fundamental Motivations
Social Justice and Experience-seeking

Key Values
Adaptability
Concern for the less fortunate
Concern for the environment
Respect for education
Contempt for traditional authorities
Hedonism

Words to Live By
There is no being, only becoming
Everything changed in Seattle
No justice, no peace

Icons
Singer Sarah McLachlan
Author Naomi Klein
Singer/activist Jello Biafra
Rap-metal group Rage Against the Machine
Author/activist John Zerzan
Actress Sarah Michelle Gellar
Dead Prez
Technology Orientation

Money Orientation
Making it: I’d never do work I didn’t believe in.
Spending it: When I must consume at all, I consume with conscience.
Saving it: I’m not saving much now, but when I do I’ll call the shots.
Stealing it: No, thanks.
Giving it away: Environmental and social causes.

I can live with that, although I’m not about to start calling myself a New Aquarian (anyway, I’m a Sagittarian, fwiw).

If you take the test(/quiz/survey/whatever) let us know your result!

Please read this letter of explanation from the NSW Film Makers Group regarding our concerns and objectives for the state of our industry. This concerns you all, and your assistance will be greatly appreciated.

NSW Film Makers Group update – June 1, 2006

A meeting was called 6 weeks ago when [...]]]>

To all NSW Film and TV Industry technicians,

Please read this letter of explanation from the NSW Film Makers Group regarding our concerns and objectives for the state of our industry.
This concerns you all, and your assistance will be greatly appreciated.

NSW Film Makers Group update – June 1, 2006

A meeting was called 6 weeks ago when a group of concerned technicians met informally at Canal Road Film Centre. The significant lack of work in all areas of film and television production including television advertising, and the restriction of NSW technicians working in Victoria, had brought this small group together. Several members of the group had written to government expressing the plight of the industry. The group has now had 6 meetings and this letter is to update and inform those interested in the outcome of those meetings. The group has been communicating with the Victorian Guild and as a consequence an open letter has been sent and distributed by the technicians booking agents from the Victorian Guild, to all NSW technicians. This letter explains that it was not the intention of the Victorian Guild to stop any interstate technicians from working in Victoria. The group is still pursuing the reasons why NSW technicians were not welcome to work in Victoria.
The group has identified and recognized the core reasons why the film industry (including feature, TV and TVC’s) is in unprecedented depression. These are listed as follows -

* Support for the film industry by Governments is not effective.
* Location costs – council charges, service charges and location fees.
* Contractual arrangements for cast/extras.
* Technicians’ rates and conditions in Sydney.

The group also recognises that the problems that ail our industry are not unique to NSW. The group has discussed including all stakeholders -suppliers, actors, extras, writers, directors, producers, editors, post production houses, service providers, etc. – in helping with the endeavours of the group, because it is in everyone’s interest. The group recognizes that a technician only organisation will not be effective to try and solve the industries problems. Anyone or any organisation that is involved in the production of film and television, in any form, will be welcome to join the group. As this is a national issue, the group will also pioneer a nation wide filmmakers group, in conjunction with other state film groups.
The group’s objectives are focusing on the following -

* Encourage all contributors and stakeholders in the film and television industry to join the group.
* Create an electronic mechanism to allow the efficient and speedy communication of information to all those wishing to support the endeavours of the group.
* Engage a professional lobbyist and strategists to assist in communicating the group’s needs to all members and Government bodies and agents.

Two weeks ago, the group decided on a name for the organisation – The NSW Film Makers Group. This should be formalized within the next few weeks. Last week, the group formalised its’ vision statement and top 10 objectives. The group has been offered generous financial support from some technicians and suppliers. Canal Road Film Centre has very generously offered, not only considerable finances, but also office space and the address for the organisation. The group will also be advertising for a co-ordinater to assist with the formation of the organisation.
The group has received the lists from the booking agents 3 week ago with the names of all of those technicians keen to show their support for the group. Thanks to all of you who have offered help and support.

The group apologises to all of those that have felt left out. To be a success, the group will need everyone’s support but please be patient. Once the website and internet forum are up and going we can all communicate directly and information, input and the hard work can all be realized with a great deal more efficiency and speed. The structure and the management of the organization have not been formalised. Once we are all communicating we can then all have a say on who is to represent this organisation and what we want to say.

David Nichols on behalf of Ray Brown, Tristran Milani, Reg Garside, Sean Conway, Jane Griffin, Penny Baldwin, Anna Howard, Simon Williams, Michael Adcock, Adrien Seffrin, Nikki Long, John Osmond, Gary Lincloln, Paul Booth, Michi Marosszeky, Moses Fotofili, Geoff Wharton, Michael Phillips, Paul Arnott, Sally Eccleston, Jeremy Fitzgerald, Brian Breheny, David Lee, Matt Toll, Warren Grieef, KenHazelwood, Dugal Campbell, Harry Dakanalis, Paul Thompson, Richard Mason.

Tom Smith – Faggot Shit: Homophobia and Male Fantasy in Orthodox Hip Hop (192kbps, 0:0:58, 1.33MB)

It’s a good example of how collage can be used to highlight certain patterns.

1. Non-commercial uses by libraries, museums and archives (eg, to allow a museum to include extracts of historical documents in materials for visitors); 2. Non-commercial uses by educational institutions for the purpose of teaching (eg, to allow a school to put an out-of-date VHS documentary onto DVD); 3. [...]]]> Instead we get something called ‘flexible dealing’ which allows for

1. Non-commercial uses by libraries, museums and archives (eg, to allow a museum to include extracts of historical documents in materials for visitors);
2. Non-commercial uses by educational institutions for the purpose of teaching (eg, to allow a school to put an out-of-date VHS documentary onto DVD);
3. Non-commercial uses for the benefit of people with disabilities (eg, to allow a person with a print disability to convert a book they own into accessible text), and
4. Parody and satire.

More info at Weatherall’s Law.

36 have been accused of spousal abuse 7 have been arrested for fraud 19 have been accused of writing bad checks 117 [...]]]>

Can you imagine working for a company that has a little more than 500 employees and has the following statistics: (Be sure to read to the end). It Must Be the music industry, rappers, the NBA …

36 have been accused of spousal abuse
7 have been arrested for fraud
19 have been accused of writing bad checks
117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses
3 have done time for assault
71, repeat 71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit
14 have been arrested on drug-related charges
8 have been arrested for shoplifting
21 currently are defendants in lawsuits. and
84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year

Can you guess which organization this is?
Give up yet? . . . Scroll down,Good citizen!
—————————————–
It’s the 535 members of the United States Congress.
The same group of Idiots that crank out hundreds of new laws each year
designed to keep the rest of us in line.

1) Key Concepts lecture series at Sydney Uni. A follow-up to last year’s Key Thinkers series which I couldn’t make due to work commitments. I’m looking forward to attending some of these.

Wednesday 3 May ‘Terra Nullius’ Andrew Fitzmaurice Wednesday 10 May ‘Nationalism’ Glenda Sluga Wednesday 17 May ‘Freedom’ Duncan Ivison Wednesday [...]]]> Some interesting free talks coming up in Sydney:

1) Key Concepts lecture series at Sydney Uni. A follow-up to last year’s Key Thinkers series which I couldn’t make due to work commitments. I’m looking forward to attending some of these.

Wednesday 3 May ‘Terra Nullius’ Andrew Fitzmaurice
Wednesday 10 May ‘Nationalism’ Glenda Sluga
Wednesday 17 May ‘Freedom’ Duncan Ivison
Wednesday 24 May ‘Truth’ Huw Price
Wednesday 31 May ‘Racism’ Ghassan Hage
Wednesday 7 June ‘Death’ Jennann Ismael
Wednesday 14 June ‘Globalisation’ Raewyn Connell

Venue: NEW VENUE FOR 2006 Footbridge Theatre The University of Sydney

Outspoken novelist, commentator and new-tech guru CORY DOCTOROW debates the future for filmmakers and media artists in this special event presented by Popcorn Taxi and the Australian Film Commission. Doctorow asks where does Hollywood get off, “with its antiquated business model, in treating the media user as a criminal with their draconian copyright laws?…Such laws limit the creative possibilities for artists and users.”An innovativeand brilliant thinker Doctorow proposes a revolutionary new model for media artists that defies the Digital Rights Management: “Technologies that seek to restrict the copying and use of digital works are wrong and wrong-headed”, Cory says. “Wrong because they don’t work, because they suppress creativity, and because they treat honest users like crooks. Wrong-headed because they seek to make digital works act as much as possibly like analog works. No DVD owner wants a way to do less with her movies, and companies that try to sell her technologies to do this deserve to go broke.”This debate is essential for any filmmaker and media artist who wants to give serious consideration to the future of their Work. The evening will include an interview and audience Q&A conducted by MARCUS GILLEZEAU, filmmaker (Firelight) and a specialist in digital production technologies.

popcorn taxi
Rated: R18+ EXEMPT from CLASSIFICATION
Time: 7.00pmDate: Wednesday, April, 19th, 2006
Where: Greater Union Bondi Junction
Address: Level 6, 500 Oxford Street, Westfield Bondi Junction Entry: Free

Cylinder Preservation and Digitization Project

Famous Cannabis Users

Google Idol

THE MARRIAGE OF CADMUS AND HARMONY FOR CHILDS

The Mercury Theatre on the Air

Nyet

sCrAmBlEd?HaCkZ! (awesome software!)

SONY admits that CD/44.1PCM is inferior

Stagg Chili Recipes

Video Downloader

xTal – free mp3 DJ VSTi plugin

Zaatar Mix